Q&A: Why do cons get their global warming news from political websites?

Question by soldier_of_god: Why do cons get their global warming news from political websites?
I’ve always debunking con lies on these boards.

First I had to prove all the well established scientific organizations engaged in geologic / meteorologic / climatic research have put out statements in support of man made global warming.

Then I had to prove human activity produces over 150 times more CO2 then all volcanic activity combined.

Then I had to debunk that old global warming petition website.

Then I had to prove it really is hotter today then the the 1940s.

I’ll come back tomorow and have to do it all over again.

AND NOTE UNLIKE CONSERVATIVES, MY SOURCES COME FROM OFFICIAL SCIENTIFIC ORGNANIZATION WEBSITES.

Best answer:

Answer by Liam H
Because they seem to be the only ones who don’t slobber over every bit of false information invented by Algore.

Give your answer to this question below!

Post Tags:

cons, from, global, News, political, their, warming, Websites,
15 Responses to Q&A: Why do cons get their global warming news from political websites?
  1. Evan B says:
    September 3, 2011 at 3:21 pm

    Keep up the fight against ignorance. It’s a hopeless battle, but it gives you something to do.

  2. Harley says:
    September 3, 2011 at 3:48 pm

    Ban all volcanic activity.

  3. producer_vortex says:
    September 3, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    Actually, they get there news from the same place you do.

  4. Devdude says:
    September 3, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    Your a tool

  5. netjr says:
    September 3, 2011 at 6:28 pm

    And those scientific web sites don’t have a political agenda? They are not funded by political causes or groups that will be self served by promoting an ideal that is based on consensus rather then fact?

  6. Ron Simmons says:
    September 3, 2011 at 7:03 pm

    DAMN

  7. baby1 says:
    September 3, 2011 at 7:43 pm

    So where is your proof that this isn’t a normal shift in the Earth’s weather patterns?

    It is a retorical question…no one can prove it so don’t bother.

  8. driveranderson says:
    September 3, 2011 at 8:42 pm

    You are not a real green are you?

  9. arcticchick says:
    September 3, 2011 at 9:41 pm

    Actually, I got my info from a variety of sources. The latest being Dr. Akasofu, a very well known scientist.

    But hey – if it makes you happy…sure. I found it on a right-wing website. Happy?

  10. Yo! says:
    September 3, 2011 at 10:28 pm

    Where did you say you got your PhD? What field is it in?

    How did we ever get along in this world before you became our savior?

    You are truly as awesome as you claim.

  11. ReedRothchild says:
    September 3, 2011 at 10:50 pm

    Good luck debunking this it was written by Richard Lindzen, he is the head of atmospheric science at M.I.T. I know that you won’t read it because you have already made up your mind on the issue just thought you could at least know that it is not a given that there is man caused global warming.

  12. jonepemberton says:
    September 3, 2011 at 10:51 pm

    If you are so concerned about CO2 and mans contributing to the concentration of it…

    STOP EXHALING

  13. archangel72901 says:
    September 3, 2011 at 10:59 pm

    Only a liberal is arrogant enough to think they can effect something like global warming.

  14. mike b says:
    September 3, 2011 at 11:32 pm

    what like AL Gore

Leave a Reply